From 675526e8925bd4963791e305636d70cf89f90a68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Greenman Date: Sun, 29 Dec 1996 09:22:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Delete bogus inconsistency check that could cause a gratuitous panic. I had added this years ago when I didn't understand all the subtilties of the flock code. --- sys/kern/kern_lockf.c | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/sys/kern/kern_lockf.c b/sys/kern/kern_lockf.c index ffe31b153d21..00b5369c587e 100644 --- a/sys/kern/kern_lockf.c +++ b/sys/kern/kern_lockf.c @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ * SUCH DAMAGE. * * @(#)ufs_lockf.c 8.3 (Berkeley) 1/6/94 - * $Id: kern_lockf.c,v 1.6 1996/09/03 14:21:52 bde Exp $ + * $Id: kern_lockf.c,v 1.7 1996/12/19 13:22:30 bde Exp $ */ #include @@ -271,13 +271,6 @@ lf_setlock(lock) block->lf_block = block->lf_block->lf_block; break; } - /* - * If we did not find ourselves on the list, but - * are still linked onto a lock list, then something - * is very wrong. - */ - if (block == NOLOCKF && lock->lf_next != NOLOCKF) - panic("lf_setlock: lost lock"); free(lock, M_LOCKF); return (error); }