something that might refer to the compatability slice rather than the
correct slice entry, try all the possible slice entries first.
This is a compatability hack to deal with the case where the kernel has
correctly mounted the root filesystem out of its slice, but the user
has not updated their /etc/fstab file to reflect this. A diagnostic
is emitted if the mount succeeds, indicating that the file should be
updated.
This is a prelude to fixing the kernel to behave as alluded to above.
Reviewed by: (discussed with) julian, phk
offset is non-zero:
- Do not match fragmented packets if the rule specifies a port or
TCP flags
- Match fragmented packets if the rule does not specify a port and
TCP flags
Since ipfw cannot examine port numbers or TCP flags for such packets,
it is now illegal to specify the 'frag' option with either ports or
tcpflags. Both kernel and ipfw userland utility will reject rules
containing a combination of these options.
BEWARE: packets that were previously passed may now be rejected, and
vice versa.
Reviewed by: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>
real path here for the mount device (or path). This fixes difficulties
unmounting devices that are actually symlinks to real devices.
Also, print the original path instead of the real path in early error
messages. nfs path handling and later error messages may still be wrong,
probably only in silly cases where the original path is both a symlink
and a remote path.
PR: 5208
size was rounded up to a multiple of the fragment size, but this
gave invalid file systems when the fragment size was > SBSIZE (fsck
aborts early on them). Now a fragment size of 32768 seems to work
(too-simple tests with fsck and iozone worked).
superblock is invalid, fsck looks at the label to help guess where
the next superblock should be. If the partition type is 4.2BSD,
fsck assumed that the block size was valid and divided by it, so
it dumped core if the size was 0.
Initialization of the label was broken almost 3 years ago in rev.1.9
of newfs/newfs.c. Newfs does not change the label at all, so there
is no problem (except the breakage of the automatic search for
backup superblocks) unless something else sets the partition type
to 4.2BSD. However, it is too easy to set partition types to
4.2.BSD by copying an old label or by using a disktab entry to
create the label.
PR: 2537
