mirror of
https://git.openafs.org/openafs.git
synced 2025-01-18 06:50:12 +00:00
tests: fix out of bounds access in the rx-event test
Use the NUMEVENTS symbol which defines the array size instead of an incorrect hard coded number when checking if a second event can be added to be fired at the same time. This fixes a potential out of bounds access of the event test array. Also update the comment which incorrectly mentions the incorrect number of events in the test. Change-Id: I4f993b42e53e7e6a42fa31302fd1baa70e9f5041 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.openafs.org/12762 Reviewed-by: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tested-by: BuildBot <buildbot@rampaginggeek.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2ae84bf053
commit
50a3eb7b7e
@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ main(void)
|
||||
ok(pthread_create(&handler, NULL, eventHandler, NULL) == 0,
|
||||
"Created handler thread");
|
||||
|
||||
/* Add 1000 random events to fire over the next 3 seconds, but front-loaded
|
||||
/* Add a number of random events to fire over the next 3 seconds, but front-loaded
|
||||
* a bit so that we can exercise the cancel/fire race path. */
|
||||
|
||||
for (counter = 0; counter < NUMEVENTS; counter++) {
|
||||
@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ main(void)
|
||||
= rxevent_Post(&eventTime, &now, eventSub, &events[counter], NULL, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* A 10% chance that we will schedule another event at the same time */
|
||||
if (counter!=999 && random() % 10 == 0) {
|
||||
if (counter < (NUMEVENTS - 1) && random() % 10 == 0) {
|
||||
counter++;
|
||||
events[counter].event
|
||||
= rxevent_Post(&eventTime, &now, eventSub, &events[counter],
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user